false
Catalog
Ketamine/Esketamine in the Treatment of Serious an ...
Presentation Q&A
Presentation Q&A
Back to course
[Please upgrade your browser to play this video content]
Video Transcription
The first question kind of coming in is, could you comment where you may place various treatments in a treatment sequence of available interventions based on available data, i.e., is there an algorithm? And secondarily, for everyday clinician, what do you recommend for some type of rating scale to kind of monitor response and remission? So I, to answer the first question, where it fits in the algorithm, I think it does have to be personalized to some extent. I think in general, for me, this is not a first line treatment, probably not even a second line. I think this is probably something that I would be turning to when I'm considering ECT. We're doing a large study. There's a large study sponsored by PCORI that is sponsored through the Cleveland Clinic, where it's a head-to-head study, ECT versus ketamine, and I think we'll have the results for that probably within the next two years, and we'll be able to see how it stands up to ECT. But in general, I think this is a treatment that is not, and even the current FDA indication is for people that have failed at least two previous antidepressants, standard oral antidepressants. I think that's a reasonable spot. Obviously, if there's an imminent risk of suicidism, it may enter into the equation somewhat there. In terms of a rating scale, if you can't do something like a Madras or a Hamilton, there are rating scales. Even the PHQ-9 may have some benefit, some of the patient rating scales or what's called the QIDS SR-16, which is a self-report. I think any of them, as long as they're used consistently, and really the patient understands what they're doing and you take the time to do those rating scales. I am a huge advocate of evidence-based and measurement-based care. That makes sense. And one last question, we'll make it a rapid-fire question, for maintenance infusions in the era of COVID-19 and rescheduling elective procedures, how have you approached ketamine infusion? Delay entail urgency or possible clinical decompensation, or is it business as usual? This is where I've been spending most of my time over the past month, month and a half. At our site, we've taken the level and taken some lead from our ambulatory surgery clinics. We've really come to the point where if it is possible to delay treatment or reduce the number of treatments, we do. We have a criteria where if you're not in urgent risk of either being hospitalized or potentially having some self-harm, we really are trying to delay the treatments at this point. Got it. But we are still offering treatments in a very careful manner, which I assume most people are doing. At least we're in Connecticut, which is a high-impact area. Yeah. That's a good answer. So I think that's all the time for questions we have.
Video Summary
In this video, the speaker addresses two questions. The first question is about where ketamine treatment fits in the algorithm of available interventions. The speaker suggests that it is not a first or second line treatment, but rather something to consider after other options have been exhausted, potentially before turning to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). A large study comparing ECT and ketamine is currently underway, which will provide more information on its efficacy. The second question asks about rating scales to monitor response and remission. The speaker recommends using consistent and evidence-based rating scales, such as the PHQ-9 or QIDS SR-16, to track patient progress. In terms of maintenance infusions during COVID-19, the speaker explains that if possible, they are delaying or reducing treatments unless there is a urgent risk of hospitalization or self-harm. However, they are still offering treatments in a cautious manner. The summary is based on a transcript from an unknown video. No credits were mentioned. The summary is 215 words long and needs to be shortened.
Keywords
ketamine treatment
interventions algorithm
ECT vs ketamine study
rating scales for response monitoring
maintenance infusions during COVID-19
Funding for SMI Adviser was made possible by Grant No. SM080818 from SAMHSA of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The contents are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official views of, nor an endorsement by, SAMHSA/HHS or the U.S. Government.
×
Please select your language
1
English